Does Niall Ferguson think that the British Empire was ultimately a good or bad thing?

But what he is really arguing is that the British were better for the world than other empires might have been. The Anglicization of North America and Australia, for example, wiped out much of their indigenous populations, and Ferguson recognizes that as a terrible cost of the empire.

What is Ferguson’s interpretation of the British Empire?

The historian Professor Niall Ferguson argues that British rule was a lot better than German, French or Belgian rule. His research suggests that British investors put huge amounts of money into developing the economies of Africa.

What is Niall Ferguson’s theory?

Ferguson argues that competition, science and property-oriented government put the West ahead of Asia, the Muslim world, and South America and proposes that modern medicine, consumerism and work ethic supported the West’s expansion into Africa, its mastery of mass marketing and consumption, and promotion of its work …

Which is the good Empire Niall Ferguson is talking about?

So salutary was the British Empire’s effect on history that Ferguson suggests the world would do well to get itself another essentially “good” empire to maintain order. The good empire he’s talking about is the United States.

Who is Niall Ferguson and what is his latest book?

Niall Ferguson wishes to disagree. Ferguson is an economist and historian at New York University and Oxford, and his latest book is “Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power,” a comprehensive history of how the British came to rule the world.

How did Britain make the modern world Niall Ferguson?

Price: £25.00 Niall Ferguson is a glutton for exposure. From January to mid-February 2003 six one-hour television programmes, four lectures to substantial audiences in the University of London’s Senate House, and a large glossy book have been devoted to his theme of ‘empire’ or, as he also puts it, ‘how Britain made the modern world’.

When did Niall Ferguson write War of the world?

In War of the World, published in 2006, Ferguson argued that a combination of economic volatility, decaying empires, psychopathic dictators, racially/ethnically motivated and institutionalised violence resulted in the wars and genocides of what he calls “History’s Age of Hatred”.