What is the commodification of otherness?

The commodification of Otherness has been so successful because it is offered as a new delight, more intense, more satisfying than normal ways of doing and feeling. Within commodity culture, ethnicity becomes spice, seasoning that can liven up the dull dish that is mainstream white culture.

What is the concept of otherness?

2. Definitions. Otherness is the result of a discursive process by which a dominant in-group (“Us,” the Self) constructs one or many dominated out-groups (“Them,” Other) by stigmatizing a difference – real or imagined – presented as a negation of identity and thus a motive for potential discrimination.

Who coined the term otherness?

Drawing on the sources outlined above, Spivak was the first to use the notion of othering in a systematic way. Although Spivak uses the concept in a review of Derrida as early as 1980, it is not until 1985 that the concept is used systematically in her essay “The Rani of Sirmur”ii.

What is meant by cultural appropriation?

Cultural appropriation refers to the use of objects or elements of a non-dominant culture in a way that doesn’t respect their original meaning, give credit to their source, or reinforces stereotypes or contributes to oppression.

What is religious otherness?

The topic of religious othering — stereotyping of people of other faiths in a prejudicial way — has become an aspect of nationalist politics and social conflict around the world.

What is Othering in psychology?

Definition. “Othering” refers to the process whereby an individual or groups of people attribute negative characteristics to other individuals or groups of people that set them apart as representing that which is opposite to them.

Is Otherism a word?

Otherism: the exclusion of a person based on their perceived diversions from an acceptable norm.

Is wearing a sari cultural appropriation?

A sari is a traditional Indian dress. There is no religious background of this dress, and if somebody not from India wears a sari skirt, it doesn’t signify cultural appropriation. This means that the people of all backgrounds can wear sari skirts. Wearing a sari skirt is not cultural appropriation.

Can othering be positive?

Positive othering (or philo-othering) is the same reduction of individuals to instances of categories (and in the process, depriving the other of otherness), but the value assigned to the other is affirmative.

What is the process of othering?

Othering is a process whereby a group of people is made to seem fundamentally different, even to the point of making that group seem less than human. This process can trigger instinctive emotional reactions towards members of that group.

What is the definition of commodification in capitalism?

CrimethInc. Democracy Now! Within a capitalist economic system, commodification is the transformation of goods, services, ideas and people into commodities or objects of trade. A commodity at its most basic, according to Arjun Appadurai, is “anything intended for exchange,” or any object of economic value.

Why is the process of commodification undeniable in most aspects?

Because of consumers’ desire to make things mainstream, the process of commodification is undeniable in most aspects. Mainstream styles and ideas fluctuate, bringing a variety of certain identities and subcultures into the spotlight for various amounts of time.

How does commodification have impacted the business environment?

Commodification has impacted the business environment in different ways. Capitalism allows entities or individuals to own anything at all – from physical goods to ideas – which led to introduction of intellectual property laws. While the laws has a scope to protect the owner, the owner has the right or possibility to trade its asset.

What is the difference between commodification and love?

In a quip: “Microprocessors are commoditized. Love is commodified.” The difference between the terms of commodification (Marxist political theory) and commoditization (business theory) has been drawn by James Surowiecki (1998) and Douglas Rushkoff (2005).