What is the modal ontological argument?

modal ontological argument. If the existence of a perfect being is. logically possible (premise (2)), then there is a possible world, w1, accessible to the actual world, wa, in which a perfect being exists. But given premise (i), a perfect being is such that if it exists in any.

Does the ontological argument justify belief in God?

There are those who would argue that the ontological argument can certainly justify belief in God, as Anselm offers an a priori deductive argument based on the logical impossibility of a contradiction, thus proving God’s existence from his definition as the GCB.

What is the ontological theory of God?

Ontological argument, Argument that proceeds from the idea of God to the reality of God. It was first clearly formulated by St. Anselm in his Proslogion (1077–78); a later famous version is given by René Descartes. Anselm began with the concept of God as that than which nothing greater can be conceived.

What did Anselm believe?

Anselm claims to derive the existence of God from the concept of a being than which no greater can be conceived. St. Anselm reasoned that, if such a being fails to exist, then a greater being—namely, a being than which no greater can be conceived, and which exists—can be conceived.

What is wrong with the ontological argument?

He argued that many theists would accept that God, by nature, cannot be fully comprehended. Therefore, if humans cannot fully conceive of God, the ontological argument cannot work. For that reason, Anselm dismissed any argument that did not relate to a being with necessary existence.

What are the five arguments for the existence of God?

Thus Aquinas’ five ways defined God as the Unmoved Mover, the First Cause, the Necessary Being, the Absolute Being and the Grand Designer. Thus by themselves these arguments cannot establish the existence of God with complete certainty.

How do you explain ontology?

In brief, ontology, as a branch of philosophy, is the science of what is, of the kinds and structures of objects. Ontology is about the object of inquiry, what you set to examine. Ontology concerns claims about the nature of being and existence.

What is difference between ontology and epistemology?

Ontology refers to what sort of things exist in the social world and assumptions about the form and nature of that social reality. Epistemology is concerned with the nature of knowledge and ways of knowing and learning about social reality.

Why did Kant reject the ontological argument?

Because we cannot experience God through experience, Kant argues that it is impossible to know how we would verify God’s existence. This is in contrast to material concepts, which can be verified by means of the senses.

What is a modal argument?

Now a modal argument is one in which either a premise or the conclusion is an ordinary or an extraordinary modal judgment. Thus, in modal arguments, we reason about what is necessary, possible, or impossible, or about what might, must, or could not be the case.

What exactly is the ontological argument?

An ontological argument is a philosophical argument , made from an ontological basis, that is advanced in support of the existence of God. Such arguments tend to refer to the state of being or existing.

What good is the ontological argument?

P rofessional philosophers commonly regard the Ontological Argument as the best single logical argument in favor of God’s existence. In fact, many secular philosophers have conceded that the Modal Ontological Argument (the version of the argument under consideration in this article) holds up under even the most rigorous scrutiny.

What is the reasoning behind the ontological argument?

The Ontological argument is a priori and is based on deductive reasoning because it seeks to prove the existence of God from the understanding of the attributes of the God of classical theism. Chapter Two of the Proslogion introduces Anselm’s argument. The first part of the argument focuses on the definition of God.