What is a consequentialist view of justice?

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. But if telling a lie would help save a person’s life, consequentialism says it’s the right thing to do.

What does Consequentialist mean in ethics?

Consequentialism: results-based ethics Of all the things a person might do at any given moment, the morally right action is the one with the best overall consequences. Whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the results of that act.

What is Consequentialism in criminal justice?

Consequentialist accounts contend that punishment is justified as a means to securing some valuable end—typically crime reduction, by deterring, incapacitating, or reforming offenders. Retributivism, by contrast, holds that punishment is an intrinsically appropriate (because deserved) response to criminal wrongdoing.

How does utilitarianism define justice?

Justice corresponds with the idea of perfect obligation: it involves the idea of a personal right. In cases of justice, the person who has been wronged has had his or her moral right impinged upon; it is thus his or her moral right to seek restitution.

What is the theory of consequentialist ethics?

Question: “What is consequentialist ethics / consequentialism?” Answer: Consequentialism is a theory of normative ethics. It holds that an act is only moral or ethical if it results in a good conclusion.

What does consequentialism mean in relation to criminal justice?

Consequentialism Criminal Justice. We associate value with friends, family etc. However, in terms of the consequentialist approach, …the rightness and wrongness of an action is determined by the action’s consequences considered impartially, without reference to the agent whose actions they are consequences of.

Which is the best example of consequentialism?

But if telling a lie would help save a person’s life, consequentialism says it’s the right thing to do. Two examples of consequentialism are utilitarianism and hedonism. Utilitarianism judges consequences by a “greatest good for the greatest number” standard.

What is the difference between utilitarianism and consequentialism?

Utilitarianism judges consequences by a “greatest good for the greatest number” standard. Hedonism, on the other hand, says something is “good” if the consequence produces pleasure or avoids pain. Consequentialism is sometimes criticized because it can be difficult, or even impossible, to know what the result of an action will be ahead of time.