What is it like to be a bat by Thomas Nagel summary?

Title: “What is it like to Be a Bat? Summary: Nagel believes reductionism is the most unlikely of all the current philosophical beliefs to shed life on consciousness. He believes that in order to shed light on the relationship between mind and body, one must address consciousness — and reductionism fails to do that.

How it feels like to be a bat?

Thus we describe bat sonar as a form of three-dimensional forward per- ception; we believe that bats feel some versions of pain, fear, hunger, and lust, and that they have other, more familiar types of perception besides sonar.

What is it like to be a bat by Thomas Nagel?

In his article, “What is it like to be a bat?” Thomas Nagel argues that there are facts about the conscious experience that are subjective and can only be known from that subjective perspective. Even if we know all the objective facts about bats, we may not actually know what it would really be like to be a bat.

Are there any objective facts about a bat?

Thomas Nagel argues that there are facts about the conscious experience that are subjective and can only be known from that subjective perspective. Even if we know all the objective facts about bats, we may not actually know what it would really be like to be a bat.

What is it like to be a bat paper?

“What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” is the name of a philosophy paper written by Thomas Nagel in 1974. The paper isn’t really about the sensory world of bats; it’s a critique of reductionist theories of the mind.

Can a human imagine what it is like to be a bat?

Thomas Nagel argues that while a human might be able to imagine what it is like to be a bat by taking “the bat’s point of view”, it would still be impossible “to know what it is like for a bat to be a bat.” ( Townsend’s big-eared bat pictured ).