What did Supreme Court say about Ram Mandir?

The judgment affirmed that the disputed land was the birthplace of Rama as per the faith and belief of Hindus, and that the Babri Masjid was built after the demolition of a Hindu temple, noting that it was not built in accordance with the tenets of Islam.

When did Supreme Court gave verdict on Ram Mandir?

November 9, 2019
November 9, 2019- The Supreme Court delivers its verdict. The SC ruled that the land belongs to Ram Lalla and ordered the government to provide an alternative five-acre land to the Sunni Waqf Board.

What Supreme Court said on Ayodhya?

In a historic decision, the Supreme Court on Saturday unanimously ruled that the disputed 2.77 acre land in Ayodhya will go to Hindus while Muslims will be given a five-acre plot at an alternate location in the city for construction of the mosque.

Who destroyed Ram Janmabhoomi?

Babur
In 1528 A.D. Babur came to Ayodhya and halted here for a week. He destroyed the ancient temple and on its site built a mosque, still known as Babur’s mosque.

Who won the Ayodhya case?

The Supreme Court, on October 16, 2019, concluded hearings in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya and reserved its judgment, which was passed on November 9. The apex court, in a unanimous verdict, gave the ownership of the disputed 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya to the Ram Janmabhoomi trust.

What is court decision in Ayodhya Ram?

The Supreme Court in a unanimous verdict on Saturday cleared the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site at Ayodhya, and directed the Centre to allot a 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.

Who gave verdict on Ayodhya?

India Ranjan Gogoi
Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi headed the five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court which delivered the verdict on the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit on Saturday.

Why is 6th December a black day?

The demolition of Babri Mosque on December 6 was an overt attempt by Hindutva forces to overshadow the observation of Mahaparinirvan Diwas by followers of Ambedkar. The Hindu right observed this day as Shaurya Diwas or the day of victory.

Did Ram temple existed in Ayodhya?

Ayodhya lit up prior to the Ram temple bhoomi poojan. Theoretically speaking, Ayodhya is the birthplace of Lord Ram, but since a mosque stood on the site for over four centuries, the push to reclaim the rightful land by Hindus had to be corroborated by archaeologists and the government of India.

Who ruled over Ayodhya?

As the tale goes, many thousands of years ago, the beautiful and thriving city of Ayodhya that lay on the banks of the river Sarayu, was ruled by King Dashrath of the Ikshvaku dynasty. Much beloved by his people, Dashrath was also blessed with three wives, Kaushalya, Kaikeyi and Sumitra.

Who is Ram Lalla in Ayodhya?

Ram Lalla Virajman is the infant Lord Ram who moved the lawsuit in 1989, through next friend and former Allahabad High Court judge Deoki Nandan Agarwal, seeking the title right on the ground that the land itself has the character of the deity and of a ‘juristic entity’. In 2002, Agarwal died.

What was the verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi case?

Supreme Court’s historic verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case by the five-judge Constitution Bench was unanimous. Here are key excerpts of what the five judges concluded

When is verdict of Supreme Court in Ram Mandir case?

* CJI Ranjan Gogoi is reading out the verdict. * Supreme Court to announce Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case verdict at 10.30 am.

What was the verdict of Supreme Court in Babri Masjid case?

* Supreme Court to announce Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case verdict at 10.30 am. * Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said that the Supreme Court verdict in Ayodhya case on Saturday will not be a victory or defeat for anyone and urged people to ensure that the judgment gives strength to India’s tradition of peace, unity and amity.

What was the Supreme Court verdict in the Ram case?

Suit 5 has been held to be maintainable at the behest of the first plaintiff (the deity of Lord Ram) who is a juristic person. The third plaintiff (next friend) has been held to be entitled to represent the the first plaintiff.