What is tenacity method of acquiring knowledge?

Tenacity is a method of knowing based largely on habit or superstition; it is a belief that exists simply because it has always been accepted. Tenacity is a method of knowing based largely on habit or superstition. One disadvantage is that the knowledge acquired using tenacity is often inaccurate.

What are the four methods of acquiring knowledge?

Four sub-processes of attaining knowledge are observation, explanation, prediction and control.

What is the methodological way of acquiring knowledge?

Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.

What are the non scientific methods of acquiring knowledge?

Nonscientific methods rely on tradition, personal experience, intuition, logic and authority to arrive at conclusions. Most of these are no longer accepted in the scientific community, but they were once extremely popular and used by many famous historical figures.

How is Rationalism used to acquire new knowledge?

But we can learn to evaluate the credentials of authority figures, to evaluate the methods they used to arrive at their conclusions, and evaluate whether they have any reasons to mislead us. Rationalism involves using logic and reasoning to acquire new knowledge.

Which is the best method of acquiring knowledge?

1. The rationalistic method of acquiring knowledge is based on the reasoning power of the human mind. 2.The empirical method is based on ‘facts’ obtained through the five senses. key points 3. scientific research is a process that combines the principles of rationalism with the process of empiricism.

Which is the best description of rationalism in philosophy?

more… In philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that “regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge” or “any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification”.

Which is a claim made by a rationalist?

Some rationalists also claim, in addition to the claims above, that the knowledge we gain by intuition and deduction, as well as the ideas and instances of knowledge that are innate to us, are indispensable and could not have been gained through sense experience, and/or that reason is superior to experience as a source of knowledge.