How do theists respond to the problem of evil?

Skeptical theism. Skeptical theism defends the problem of evil by asserting that God allows an evil to happen in order to prevent a greater evil or to encourage a response that will lead to a greater good.

What is the most common theistic defense to the problem of evil?

The article clarifies the nature of the logical problem of evil and considers various theistic responses to the problem. Special attention is given to the free will defense, which has been the most widely discussed theistic response to the logical problem of evil.

What is the theological term for the problem of evil?

theodicy
Weber framed the problem of evil as the dilemma that the good can suffer and the evil can prosper, which became more important as religion became more sophisticated. He identified two purposes of theodicy: to explain why good people suffer (a theodicy of suffering), and why people prosper (a theodicy of good fortune).

How does Socrates explain the problem of evil?

Socrates believed that no one does wrong voluntarily. Evil is the result of ignorance. If people knew what was the right thing to do they would do it. We always choose what we think is the best or good for us.

What are the 3 types of evil?

According to Leibniz, there are three forms of evil in the world: moral, physical, and metaphysical.

What is the problem with evil and suffering?

Moral evil and suffering – this is suffering caused by the actions of humans. Examples include acts of murder, and war. Natural evil and suffering – this is suffering that is caused by nature and has nothing to do with the actions of humans. Examples include earthquakes, floods, tsunamis and disease.

What is the greatest evil according to Socrates?

This self inflicted harm to one’s soul caused by not acting virtuously is the greatest evil which could befall an individual. In fact, Socrates went so far as to put forth the astonishing claim that it is better to suffer an injustice than to commit an injustice.

What are the 4 types of evil?

The Four Types of Evil

• Demonic Evil.
• Instrumental Evil.
• Idealistic Evil.
• Foolish Evil.

What is pure evil?

The definition of “pure evil” used by the researchers consisted of eight core components: Pure evil involves the intentional infliction of harm, pure evil is driven primarily by the wish to inflict harm merely for the pleasure of doing so, the victim of evil is innocent and good, evil represents the antithesis of order …

What are some examples of suffering?

For example, depression, anxiety, grief, and existential suffer- ing are all types of mental suffering. Suffering is defined as distress result- ing from threat or damage to one’s body or self-identity.

What did Socrates say about ignorance?

Knowing That You Know Nothing It is captured by the well-known statement: “I know only one thing–that I know nothing.” Paradoxically, Socratic ignorance is also referred to as “Socratic wisdom.”

What is good According to Socrates?

According to Socrates’ theory of value, there are two sorts of good: virtue and happiness. Both are unconditional goods.

How does the open theist respond to the problem of evil?

In this response, the open theist handles the problem of pain and suffering by saying that God, due to his commitment to man’s freedom, can’t do anything about it. This is a self-limiting of both God’s power and his knowledge. Evil may happen, but it is only because God is committed to the freedom of man’s will.

Which is the best response to the problem of evil?

The Sadotheistic response: Conclusion: God enjoys to bring about suffering and pain for no reason at all. God is on an opposing team. The Sadotheist believes that God is an evil sadist who enjoys bringing about suffering with no good intentions whatsoever. This could be true. It could be the case that God is a sadist.

How is the problem of evil different from theodicies?

We can distinguish between: b)The evidentiary problem of evil – evil counts as evidence against the gods. theodicies (complete explanations for evil.) A defense is easy, you just need to show that it is rational to believe in gods and evil simultaneously. A theodicy is hard, it must show how evil fits into a god’s plan.

What is the pantheistic view of the problem of evil?

The pantheistic view is simply to close our eyes and ears and act as if evil, suffering, and pain do not really exist. In this view, all suffering is an illusion that we must train ourselves to be blind to. But this does not work, either rationally or biblically. To deny the existence of something does not determine the existence of something.