Who are some of the early thinkers of agnosticism?

Agnosticism. Earlier thinkers, however, had written works that promoted agnostic points of view, such as Sanjaya Belatthaputta, a 5th-century BCE Indian philosopher who expressed agnosticism about any afterlife; and Protagoras, a 5th-century BCE Greek philosopher who expressed agnosticism about the existence of “the gods”.

What did Serge Brammertz do for the International Criminal Court?

Brammertz was Deputy Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court from 2002 to 2007. He was a federal prosecutor in Belgium from 1997 to 2002 and assisted the Council of Europe as an expert with a mandate to “set up a mechanism for evaluating and applying nationally international undertakings concerning the fight against organized crime”.

Which is the best description of Weak agnosticism?

Weak agnosticism (also called “soft”, “open”, “empirical”, or “temporal agnosticism”) The view that the existence or nonexistence of any deities is currently unknown but is not necessarily unknowable; therefore, one will withhold judgment until evidence, if any, becomes available.

What kind of language does Serge Brammertz speak?

Brammertz is also a former Professor of law at the University of Liège. He is a native German speaker and also speaks fluent Dutch, French and English.

Which is the best definition of the term agnosticism?

ISBN 0-02-865780-2. In the most general use of the term, agnosticism is the view that we do not know whether there is a God or not. (page 56 in 1967 edition) ^ a b c Rowe, William L. (1998). “Agnosticism”.

What does the Rig Veda say about agnosticism?

Throughout the history of Hinduism there has been a strong tradition of philosophic speculation and skepticism. The Rig Veda takes an agnostic view on the fundamental question of how the universe and the gods were created. Nasadiya Sukta ( Creation Hymn) in the tenth chapter of the Rig Veda says: Whence it all came, and how creation happened?

What do agnostics deny and repudiate as immoral?

That which Agnostics deny and repudiate, as immoral, is the contrary doctrine, that there are propositions which men ought to believe, without logically satisfactory evidence; and that reprobation ought to attach to the profession of disbelief in such inadequately supported propositions.