Articles

What is the historical background of the book of Acts?

What is the historical background of the book of Acts?

Acts was written in Greek, presumably by St. Luke the Evangelist. The Gospel According to Luke concludes where Acts begins, namely, with Christ’s Ascension into heaven. Acts was apparently written in Rome, perhaps between 70 and 90 ce, though some think a slightly earlier date is also possible.

What happens if we determine that the New Testament is reliable?

Our list of possible world religions is narrowed to just one: Christianity. What happens if we determine that the New Testament is reliable? The New Testament Church begins and spreads. Choose three key things that are mentioned in the book of Acts.

How many years of history does the Acts of the Apostles cover?

About how many years of church history does the Acts of the Apostles cover? -30 years.

Are Paul’s letters reliable?

There is no record of scholarly doubt concerning authorship until the 19th century when, around 1840, German scholar Ferdinand Christian Baur accepted only four of the letters bearing Paul’s name as genuine, which he called the Hauptebriefe (Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, and Galatians).

Is the reliability of the Old Testament a question?

Many doubt the historical reliability of the Old Testament, but the New Testament supports it and there is a substantial body of external ancient Near Eastern historical and archaeological backing for it as well.

Is the Acts of the Apostles a reliable source?

The historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles, the principal historical source for the Apostolic Age, is of interest for biblical scholars and historians of Early Christianity as part of the debate over the historicity of the Bible .

Is there any evidence that the New Testament is reliable?

Ironically, there has never been more evidence readily available that actually supports their reliability. Of course, historical research can never confirm or refute theological claims (e.g., Jesus died for humanity’s sins), but without historical facts (e.g., Jesus lived and died) the theology has no foundation.

How does archaeology affect the reliability of the New Testament?

Peter S. Williams examines the historical reliability of the New Testament in the light of the findings of archaeology. “On the whole … archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the Scriptural record.