What do you mean by reflexivity?

Reflexivity generally refers to the examination of one’s own beliefs, judgments and practices during the research process and how these may have influenced the research. Reflexivity involves questioning one’s own taken for granted assumptions.

What is cultural reflexivity?

Cultural reflexivity is defined as an open-ended form of using cultural objects to mediate the self, and then compared to other types of practice – traditional and rationalised. Finally, the social conditions for cultural reflexivity are analysed, both at the structural and personal level.

What is reflexivity in ethnography?

Reflexivity, in ethnography, has come to mean thinking carefully about who has done the research and how, under what conditions, how it was written, by whom, and what impact these might have on the value of the ethnography produced.

What are the two types of reflexivity?

Reflexivity can be divided into two types: prospective and retrospective. Prospective reflexivity refers to the effects of the researcher on the study, whereas retrospective reflexivity refers to the effects of the study on the researcher (Attia and Edge, 2016).

What is the definition of reflexivity in anthropology?

Marcus (1998) depicts reflexivity as the practice of positioning, stating that it ‘locates the ethnographer his or her literal position In relation to subjects’. Essentially, reflexivity conveys to the audience that the ethnographer was “there” within the field.

When was the time of reflection in anthropology?

Reflection and Reflexivity in Anthropology Robert A. Rubinstein The years between 1930 and the early 1940s were especially im­ portant for the development of anthropology in the United States. This was a time of intdlectual fervor and, in relation to the previous decades, unparalleled growth.

What is the definition of a reflexive relationship?

Reflexivity (social theory) A reflexive relationship is bidirectional with both the cause and the effect affecting one another in a relationship in which neither can be assigned as causes or effects.

Why is reflexivity important for a social scientist?

Bourdieu argued that the social scientist is inherently laden with biases, and only by becoming reflexively aware of those biases can the social scientists free themselves from them and aspire to the practice of an objective science. For Bourdieu, therefore, reflexivity is part of the solution, not the problem.