Articles

Is episiotomy evidence based?

Is episiotomy evidence based?

Authors’ conclusions: In women where no instrumental delivery is intended, selective episiotomy policies result in fewer women with severe perineal/vaginal trauma. Other findings, both in the short or long term, provide no clear evidence that selective episiotomy policies results in harm to mother or baby.

Is it better to tear naturally or have an episiotomy?

natural tearing. Research has shown that moms seem to do better without an episiotomy, with less risk of infection, blood loss (though there is still risk of blood loss and infection with natural tears), perineal pain and incontinence as well as faster healing.

What are the pros and cons of episiotomy?

The primary advantage of a mediolateral episiotomy is that the risk for anal muscle tears is much lower. However, there are many more disadvantages associated with this type of episiotomy, including: increased blood loss. more severe pain.

What are 3 benefits of an episiotomy?

It is concluded that episiotomies prevent anterior perineal lacerations (which carry minimal morbidity), but fail to accomplish any of the other maternal or fetal benefits traditionally ascribed, including prevention of perineal damage and its sequelae, prevention of pelvic floor relaxation and its sequelae, and …

Where is the incision made during an episiotomy?

By Mayo Clinic Staff. An episiotomy is an incision made in the perineum — the tissue between the vaginal opening and the anus — during childbirth. Although the procedure was once a routine part of childbirth, that’s no longer the case.

Do you need to know the benefits of an episiotomy?

An episiotomy requires suturing and benefits and harms as part of routine management of normal births remains unclear. In particular, we need to know if it does indeed prevent large tears, because women otherwise may be subjected to an unnecessary operation, pain and in some cases long-term problems.

Is it safe to use selective episiotomy for vaginal delivery?

Outcomes could be better standardised and measured. In women where no instrumental delivery is intended, selective episiotomy policies result in fewer women with severe perineal/vaginal trauma. Other findings, both in the short or long term, provide no clear evidence that selective episiotomy policies results in harm to mother or baby.

Is there evidence that selective episiotomy reduces perineal trauma?

Other findings, both in the short or long term, provide no clear evidence that selective episiotomy policies results in harm to mother or baby. The review thus demonstrates that believing that routine episiotomy reduces perineal/vaginal trauma is not justified by current evidence.