What was significant about the Regents of the University of California v Bakke case?

In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.

What was the significance of Bakke v California?

Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy.

What was the decision in Bakke vs University of California?

Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.

Who was the Regents of the University of California v Bakke?

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | Oyez Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. He was rejected both times.

Who are the Regents of the University of California?

(Redirected from Regents of the University of California v. Bakke) Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California, Bakke v.

Who was the respondent in the Bakke case?

Bakke Brief Fact Summary. The Respondent, Bakke (Respondent), a white applicant to the University of California, Davis Medical School, sued the University, alleging his denial of admission on racial grounds was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (Constitution).

Why was John Bakke rejected from the University of California Davis?

Bakke was in his early 30s while applying, and therefore considered too old by at least two institutions. After twice being rejected by the University of California, Davis, he brought suit in state court challenging the constitutionality of the school’s affirmative action program.