What is an objection to the cosmological argument?

One objection to the argument is that it leaves open the question of why the First Cause is unique in that it does not require any causes. Proponents argue that the First Cause is exempt from having a cause, while opponents argue that this is special pleading or otherwise untrue.

Who criticized the cosmological argument?

Kant’s criticism of the second stage of the cosmological proof is also discussed and it is argued that his principle that this must be a pure a priori argument is unduly restrictive.

What is wrong with the cosmological argument?

A flaw in the cosmological argument is in giving special exclusive status to a deity that would need no creator or origin outside of itself- a necessary being–without acknowledging that such status could be given to the basic stuff, physis, of the universe, its energy, that can take different forms..

What are the 4 cosmological arguments?

A cosmological argument, in natural theology, is an argument which claims that the existence of God can be inferred from facts concerning causation, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the universe or some totality of objects.

What are the objections to the cosmological argument?

Opponents of the argument tend to argue that it is unwise to draw conclusions from an extrapolation of causality beyond experience. One objection to the argument is that it leaves open the question of why the First Cause is unique in that it does not require any causes.

How is the cosmological argument used in natural theology?

Cosmological argument, Form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of God. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa theologiae, presented two versions of the cosmological argument: the first-cause argument and the argument from contingency. The first-cause argument begins with the fact that there is change in…

Is the cosmological argument commits a fallacy of composition?

This objection states that the cosmological arguments commits a fallacy of composition. What is a fallacy of composition and how does it relate to the cosmological argument?

Where can I find the cosmological argument in Asian philosophy?

Although the cosmological argument does not figure prominently in Asian philosophy, a very abbreviated version of it, proceeding from dependence, can be found in Udayana’s Nyāyakusumāñjali I,4.