What is the difference between I and me according to Mead?

The terms refer to the psychology of the individual, where in Mead’s understanding, the “me” is the socialized aspect of the person, and the “I” is the active aspect of the person.

What is the difference between the I and the me in the concept of the self?

This distinction was originally based on the idea that the former (“Me”) corresponds to the self as an object of experience (self as object), while the latter (“I”) reflects the self as a subject of experience (self as subject).

What is the difference between I and me for symbolic Interactionism?

The me is the internalization of roles which derive from such symbolic processes as linguistic interaction, playing and gaming whereas the I is a creative response to the symbolized structures of the me. The ‘I’ appear as a symbolized object in our consciousness of our past actions but then it has become part of me.

How does Mead define self consciousness?

For Mead, what we call our sense of self stems from the human ability to be self-conscious, to take ourselves as objects of experience. Only by being able to take others’ perspectives can we gain a viewpoint from outside of our own egos from which to think about and evaluate our personal identities.

What does Mead mean by’i’and’me’?

The terms refer to the psychology of the individual, where in Mead’s understanding, the “me” is the socialized aspect of the person, and the “I” is the active aspect of the person. One might usefully ‘compare Mead’s “I” and “me”, respectively, with Sartre’s “choice” and “the situation”.

What was the concept of the ” I ” and the ” Me “?

Mead discussed the concept of the “I” and the “Me” as the tow parts of the self. Explain each of the two parts. Mead discussed the concept of the “I” and the “Me” as the tow parts of the self. Explain each of the two parts.

How did John Mead think about the self?

Mead saw the Self as emerging from the social interaction of humans in which the individual takes on the role of the “other” and internalises the attitudes he perceives in both real and imagined others.

How is Mead’s theory similar to Cooley’s?

Similar to Cooley, Mead’s theory is built on the idea that the individual experiences him or herself through the generalized other or the individual of their social group (Lemert, 169). This means that our conceptualization of ourselves are not limited to our solitary experiences.