What is a good Hirsch index?

Let’s talk numbers: what h-index is good? According to Hirsch, a person with 20 years of research experience with an h-index of 20 is good, 40 is great, and 60 is remarkable.

Who has the highest h-index in physics?

Theortical physicist Ed Witten from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, who has the highest h-index, also comes top in the w-index ranking with a score of 41.

Is an h-index of 15 good?

H-index scores between 3 and 5 seem common for new assistant professors, scores between 8 and 12 fairly standard for promotion to the position of tenured associate professor, and scores between 15 and 20 about right for becoming a full professor.

What is a good h-index for a philosopher?

Obviously much older academics have higher h-indices. It’s very hard to move from an h-index of n to an h-index of n+1, and there are very few philosophers with an h-index of 20 or over (you would need at least 20 publications, and they would have to be cited at least 20 times or more).

What does the Hirsch index mean in science?

Finding your h-index (Hirsch index) in Web of Science. What is the h-index? “An index that quantifies both the actual scientific productivity and the apparent scientific impact of a scientist.”. eg. An h-index of 25 means the researcher has 25 papers, each of which has been cited 25+ times.

Is the h index higher in sociology or physics?

Well, in fact, the h-index is as a rule higher for people from physics and the like than for those coming from, say, anthropology or sociology. – And yes: the model suits perfectly the U.S. academics. The value of the h-index will indeed vary by field. The reasons for this difference are based on a number of factors.

Which is a good h index for a research paper?

You say that “The H-index varies among disciplines and depends on the field’s citation dynamics. H-index of 40 is considered to be a very good one and H-index of 60 and above is in the level of excellence.”.

How is the Hirsch index similar to Eddington number?

The Hirsch index is analogous to the Eddington number, an earlier metric used for evaluating cyclists. The h -index serves as an alternative to more traditional journal impact factor metrics in the evaluation of the impact of the work of a particular researcher.