What is better than AMD FX 6300?

Highly recommending the i3 4170. -Performs better than the FX 6300 in every single video game. -Has 4 virtual cores and has a much better per core power. -i3 4170 almost does as good as the FX 8320.

Is the AMD FX 6300 still good?

The good news though is that the FX-6300 is still perfect for a budget build. The big bucks you save on this processor can be better spent on other peripherals and hardware. Let’s get straight into the benchmarks and scores. With PassMark, it is immediately evident that single core performance of the FX 6300 is poor.

What socket is fx6300?

Socket AM3+
AMD 6300 Specs

What is the difference between AMD fx-4300 and FX-8350?

The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the AMD FX-4300 and AMD FX-8350 microprocessors. Information in this table was retrieved from actual processors using CPUID instruction, and we also utilized internal timer to measure CPU frequency.

Which is better the 6300 or the 8350?

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 8350 Black Edition vs the 6300 Black Edition. CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 6300 Black Edition vs the 8350 Black Edition.

Which is better AMD FX-8350 or Intel i5 2500K?

The AMD is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel’s two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May ’13 CPUPro]

When did the AMD fx-4300 come out?

The AMD FX-4300 is a budget quad-core processor which unlike its predecessor, the Bulldozer FX-4100, is based on the Piledriver micro-architecture which was released in Q4 of 2012. Its base clock speed of 3.8 GHz boosts to 4.0 GHz in turbo mode and with appropriate cooling can be overclocked to speeds of over 4.5 GHz.