Is the reign of terror justified Dbq?

Reign Of Terror Dbq Analysis The Reign of Terror was not justified because the actions toward external threat did not require it, the actions toward internal threat did not deserve it, and the methods that were used were to extreme.

Why was the reign of terror necessary?

Although the print is sinister, its caption states that the Terror is dreadful, but necessary. Reign of Terror lasted from September 1793 until the fall of Robespierre in 1794. Its purpose was to purge France of enemies of the Revolution and protect the country from foreign invaders.

How did the Jacobins justify the reign of terror?

The Jacobins felt that it was their duty to preserve the revolution, even if it meant violence and terror. The Committee of Public Safety introduced several new laws. They wanted to make “Terror” an official government policy.

Was the reign of terror a necessary evil?

Answer: The reign of Terror was a necessary evil in the sense that it warded off the internal Revolutionary enemies such as the clergy, nobility and Royalists who were offended by the revolutionary developments as the Civil Constitution of the Clergy and Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen.

Why was the Reign of Terror not justified?

The first reason the Reign of Terror was not justified was because of the huge amount of deaths that were cause by it. A second reason the Reign of Terror was not justified would be all of the rights that were denied from the people of France as well as the horrendous and bloody actions committed during the terror.

What factors led to the end of the Reign of Terror?

The Reign of Terror was at an end. In the aftermath of the coup, the Committee of Public Safety lost its authority, the prisons were emptied, and the French Revolution became decidedly less radical. The Directory that followed saw a return to bourgeois values, corruption, and military failure.

What was a positive result of the Reign of Terror?

What was a positive result of the Reign of Terror? Ordinary people won more political rights and freedoms.

What was a positive result of the reign of terror?

Why was the reign of terror not justified?

What was the impact of the Reign of Terror?

Can the Reign of Terror be justified?

(Document F) The question is whether this behavior by the revolutionary government was justified. The Reign of Terror was not justified. The evidence shows that the Reign of Terror was not justified because of the sheer number of people who have been killed and executed.

What was the reign of terror summary?

Reign of Terror: A period of violence during the French Revolution incited by conflict between two rival political factions, the Girondins and the Jacobins, and marked by mass executions of “the enemies of the revolution.” The death toll ranged in the tens of thousands, with 16,594 executed by guillotine and another …

What was the causes of the reign of Terror?

The main causes of the reign of terror were that people was obsessed with the anti-revolution feeling so thousands of people were suspected of anti-revolutionary activities or of helping France’s enemies. All of them were sent to the guillotine even if there was no evidence to accuse them.

Why did the reign of terror stop?

The Reign of Terror also came to an end, because nuns had been executed because they did not want to give up their monastic vows and they were very calm during the execution, so this shifted the mood in Paris, probably making the general population realize that the mass executions were futile.

What Revolution did the reign of Terror executions occur?

The Reign of Terror, commonly The Terror (French: la Terreur ), was a period of the French Revolution when, following the creation of the First French Republic, a series of massacres and numerous public executions took place in response to revolutionary fervour, anticlerical sentiment, and accusations of treason by the Committee of Public Safety .

How did the reign of Terror affect the French nation?

The Reign of Terror instituted the conscripted army, which saved France from invasion by other countries and in that sense preserved the Revolution. However, for the most part, it destabilized the country , rather than solidifying the gains of the Revolution and leading to a virtuous and happy republic, as its authors had hoped.