What is the difference between Hypertextuality and intertextuality?

Intertextuality is the ability of text to be linked with other texts as its inherent quality. Alternatively, hypertextuality, is the ability of text to be linked with other texts by means of electronic links.

What are the three types of intertextuality?

Intertextuality and intertextual relationships can be separated into three types: obligatory, optional and accidental. These variations depend on two key factors: the intention of the writer, and the significance of the reference.

What are examples of intertextuality?

The definition of intertextuality includes forms of parody, pastiche, retellings, homage, and allegory. Any work of literature that is involved in the creation of a new text is considered intertextual.

How is intertextuality different to allusions?

An allusion is a brief and concise reference that a writer uses in another narrative without affecting the storyline. Intertextuality, on the other hand, uses the reference of the full story in another text or story as its backbone.

What is the concept of intertextuality?

The relationships among texts that shape a text’s meaning. Intertextuality is the echoes of other texts that add layers of meaning.

What are the advantages of intertextuality?

The advantage of an intertextual approach is that it focuses on the process of composition to reveal intention, while allowing for the reader’s role in producing the meaning of a text. It is both reader and writer centred, encompassing the entire process by which a text comes into being and is understood.

What are the 5 types of intertextuality?

Intertextual figures include: allusion, quotation, calque, plagiarism, translation, pastiche and parody.

What is the effect of intertextuality?

Recognising and understanding intertextuality leads to a much richer reading experience which invites new interpretations as it brings another context, idea, story into the text at hand. It also provides one way for students to compose their own texts drawn from their knowledge of others.

What is the weakness of intertextuality?

The disadvantage of an intertextual approach to literature is that it seems to require specialist knowledge on the part of the reader. It ignores the fact that a word or phrase can mean something to a reader, whether or not the reader knows if that word or phrase has already been used by a previous writer.

What are disadvantages of intertextuality?

What is the importance of intertextuality?

Intertextuality is an important stage in understanding a piece of literature, as it is necessary to see how other works have influenced the author and how different texts are employed in the piece to convey certain meanings.

Why is intertextuality so important?

When was intertextuality introduced to Biblical Studies?

Intertextuality and Biblical Studies: A Review The literary term “intertextuality” was introduced into biblical studies in 1989 and concerns the complex relationships that exist between texts.

How are intertextuality and dialogism different in literature?

In fact, some have called dialogism a kind of INTRAtextuality in order to distinguish it from intertextuality. For Bakhtin, one of the dialogues always already ongoing in a novel is that between a character and the author. Another is the double-voiced function ongoing within the individual character him/herself.

How are Bakhtin’s dialogism and intertextuality similar?

Bakhtin’s dialogism and Kristeva’s intertextuality are very similar. And over the course of the history theory, since Kristeva, the differences between the two terms has become (dialogically) more defined and more blurred. Both terms acknowledge that every word or text is always already double-voiced (or multiple, heteroglossia).

What’s the difference between intertextuality and polylogism?

And if you were to do so, polylogism is a better approximation of what intertextuality is. Even though the term intertextuality was coined decades after dialogism, dialogism is a kind of intertextuality. In fact, some have called dialogism a kind of INTRAtextuality in order to distinguish it from intertextuality.