What does parentocracy mean in sociology?
What does parentocracy mean in sociology?
Parentocracy is a term used to refer to the idea that the parents are in change of the education system. It refers particularly to the marketisation policies of 1988 and subsequently which aimed to give parents significantly more choice over their children’s education.
What is compensatory education sociology?
Compensatory education (positive discrimination) is used by the state to compensate for the social inequalities outside of school affecting educational outcomes. Examples are: Operation Head Start/Surestart.
What is silt shifting in sociology?
Offered the main criticisms of the market system: ‘cream-skimming’ and ‘silt-shifting’. This refers to the way in which schools aim to select only the best students and throw out the worst. Schools begin to ignore those who are more costly and require more attention/resources to do well.
What is marketisation sociology?
Marketisation – Refers to aim of making schools compete with one another for government funding i.e. the better a school does the previous year the more money a school receives the following year. This essentially makes schools into “businesses” competing with one another i.e. making an education “market”.
What is a hidden curriculum sociology?
Hidden curriculum refers to the unwritten, unofficial, and often unintended lessons, values, and perspectives that students learn in school. Cultural expectations: The academic, social, and behavioral expectations established by schools and educators communicate messages to students.
Why is Parentocracy good?
Parentocracy (or the myth of parentocracy) be better able to understand and compare schools in the league tables. be better able to access, understand and evaluate Ofsted reports. be better able, both financially and logistically, to make effective use of appeals procedures.
Is Sure Start compensatory education?
Sure Start centres were established by the Labour government after 1997 as a form of compensatory education.
What is the difference between cream skimming and silt-shifting?
Cream-skimming – selecting higher ability students who gain the best results and cost less to teach. Silt-shifting – offloading students which learning difficulties who are expensive and get poor results.
What is the difference between marketisation and Privatisation?
Thus, while privatisation is about the logics of who conducts education, commercialisation is about how actors profit from the ‘commodification’ of education. Commercialisation can occur without privatisation; for example, a public school can purchase assessment support services from commercial providers.
Is the hidden curriculum good or bad?
Hidden curricula teach students beyond the subject content of their courses. An educator can design hidden curriculum to teach positive characteristics such as dignity, humility, hard work, responsibility, and appreciation. Hidden curriculum has the potential to positively impact students and even change lives.
What is an example of the hidden curriculum?
Hidden curriculum consists of concepts informally and often unintentionally taught in our school system. Social expectations of gender, language, behavior, or morals are examples of this.
How does marketisation benefit the middle class?
The researchers concluded that marketisation benefited middle-class children, whose parents took advantage of the system to reinforce their advantages. They found that schools contributed to this situation as they felt that becoming an increasingly middle-school would help them move up the league tables.
What does the term parentocracy mean in sociology?
Parentocracy is a term used to refer to the idea that the parents are in change of the education system. It refers particularly to the marketisation policies of 1988 and subsequently which aimed to give parents significantly more choice over their children’s education. Moreover, what is Marketisation in sociology?
Is the concept of parentocracy still relevant for middle class education?
We provide an expanded conceptualization of parentocracy and suggest that it provides a useful encapsulation of a number of similar, and/or complementary, conceptual approaches to understanding middle class educational advantage.
Are there any downsides to parentocracy at all?
It also leads to the risk of entitled children who have been spoiled by parents pulling favours for them in the through affiliations or financial means, and consequently not learning to fight for themselves or rely solely on their own efforts and abilities. The other possible downside of parentocracy is burnout.
What was the concept of parentocracy in 1990?
According t o David ( 19 95 ), Brown’s idea of for children ’ ’ (p. 276). She observes, moreove r, that in the 1990 s, customer/contractors or contractor/provider splits in public services. With economic diversity. They were to become the key judges of the quality and professionals or providers. (David 1993, p. 272) ideology of parentocracy.